Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Parsons v. Kaufman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1927No. File No. 5556PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment declaring him guilty of contempt of court. He assigns the following errors:

'(i) The court erred in entering judgment against defendant.(2) The findings of fact do not support the judgment in that there is no finding as a fact that the defendant intentionally violated the terms and conditions of said injunctional order; and there is no finding as a fact that the defendant did sell and deliver *648on said premises intoxicating liquors; and it is not found as a fact that the defendant did knowingly permit intoxicating, liquors to be kept, sold, and delivered on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Ex parte HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hoffman v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. State v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Van Loh v. ProsserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fienup v. RenttoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hines v. MoultonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Johnson v. Petroleum Carriers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Cohrt v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API