Burnett v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. The only ground of the motion for a new trial other than the general grounds is based upon alleged newly discovered evidence,-the only effect of which would be to impeach a witness for the State. Even “though the witness sought to be impeached by newly discovered evidence was the only witness against the.prisoner upon a vital point in the case, if the sole effect of the evidence would be to impeach the witness a new trial will not be granted.” Arwood v. State, 59 Ga. 391; Levining v. State, *64813 Ga. 513; Wright v. State, 34 Ga. 110 (2); Jackson v. State, 93 Ga. 190 (18 S. E. 401); Haynes v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ivey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Arwood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Wright v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1864
- Levining v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MorrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Stubbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Gaillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.