Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1930No. 20701PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The first special ground of the motion *226for a new trial alleges that another trial should be granted “for the reason that when the case was called and both sides announced ready for trial, the rule of sequestration was invoked on both sides. The witness for the State and the defendant were sequestered. That the accusation was then handed to the attorneys representing the defendant, who signed the following waiver: Copy of accusation and list of witnesses and formal arraignment waived.’ That at the time of signing said waiver the name of W. H. Blackburn did not appear upon the back of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Monroe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  2. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  3. Inman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Paschal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Tumlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API