Legal Opinion

Geiser Mfg. Co. v. Lunsford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Hale County; L. S. Kinder, Judge. Action by J. W. Lunsford and others against the Geiser Manufacturing Company and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

The petition of J. W. Lunsford and C. T. Doane against defendants, the Geiser Manufacturing Co., the First National Bank of Plainview, and E. A. Harp, alleged, in substance, that the Geiser Manufacturing Company is a foreign corporation, without permit to do business in Texas and without property in Texas; that on March 23, 1908, plaintiffs agreed to buy from said Manufacturing Company a complete new steam-plow outfit, for which they executed to said Manufacturing Company their six certain negotiable notes, and in connection with same gave a mortgage lien on certain horses, and assigned…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Grabenheimer v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Trauzettel v. KjellmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Rachal.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Moore-De Grazier Co. v. RitterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API