Legal Opinion

J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Rachal.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1917No. 5798PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOURSÜND, J.

We. adopt appellee’s statement of the nature of the pleadings, as it is more complete than that of appellant:

“Appellee, F. S. Rachal, brought this suit against the appellant, J. I. Case Threshing Machine Company, to rescind the contract of sale of a certain automobile, alleged to have been made by the appellant to the appellee. Appellee based -his suit upon the grounds that he was induced to buy the car by false representations of the appellant, and that the consideration for the purchase wholly failed, and the sale was voidable at his election. Appellee further alleged that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houston Motor Car Co. v. BrashearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Hubbs v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Geiser Mfg. Co. v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Manes v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Avery Co. of Texas v. Harrison Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Conley v. Comstock Oil & Gas, LPCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API