State v. Denson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Judge:
¶1 We hold that the statute criminalizing possession of burglary tools, Arizona Revised Statute (“A.R.S.”) section 13-1505(A)(1) (2016), is not unconstitutionally vague. Additionally, we hold there was sufficient evidence to support Thomas Denson’s convictions for second degree burglary and possession of burglary tools. We therefore affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1
¶2 On March 24, 2014, at around 2:40 a.m., victim J.B. awoke in his bedroom with a light shining in his eyes from a flashlight shining down the hallway. He got out of bed and ran down the hallway, but the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Bryan Mitchell LietzauArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- State v. DerricoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. FranciscoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- State v. FranciscoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.