Doe v. Lee

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JOHN DOE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) NO. 3:21-cv-00809 ) v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) WILLIAM B. LEE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. No. 13, “Motion”). Via the Motion, Defendants ask the Court to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine. Plaintiff responded in opposition (Doc. No. 19, “Response”), and Defendants replied (Doc. No. 20, “Reply”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court declines to exercise…