Legal Opinion
Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 19, 1996No. CX-95-1144Published
1Opinion of the Court
541 N.W.2d 600 (1995)
Kay Louise STOEBE, Respondent,
v.
MERASTAR INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.
No. CX-95-1144.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
December 26, 1995.
Review Granted March 19, 1996.
Mary C. Cade, Mark H. Gruesner, Schwebel, Goetz, Sieben & Moskal, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.
Michael B. Padden, Hurwitz & Padden, P.L.C., St. Paul, for appellant.
Considered and decided by PETERSON, P.J., and KALITOWSKI and SCHUMACHER, JJ.
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
On appeal from the denial of a new trial motion, Merastar Insurance Company challenges the district court's determination that Minn.R.Civ.P. 68…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Greenwood v. StevensonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.