Reynolds v. E. Clemens Horst Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District for a stay of the issuance and transmission of the remittitur in order to permit application to Supreme Court of United States for a writ of certiorari. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an application by appellant for a stay of the issuance and transmission of the remittitur from "this court to the superior court of the county of Tehama. The application is made in order that appellant, before execution of the judgment, may have an opportunity to apply to the supreme court of the United States for a writ of certiorari, it being contended that said superior court had no jurisdiction of appellant by reason of its residence in another state. The judgment of the lower court was affirmed by this court on December 28, 1917 (35 Cal. App. 711, [170 Pac. 1082]), and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trumpler v. TrumplerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Reynolds v. E. Clemens Horst Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Eaton v. Cleveland, St. L. & K. C. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1890
3Cited by2 opinions
- Severns Drilling Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Severns Drilling Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936