Legal Opinion
Buckner v. Castro
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 2010No. SD 29780PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.
Charles Buckner (“Mr. Buckner”) and Katherine Buckner (“Mrs. Buckner”) (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the judgment of the trial court which denied their request for a prescriptive easement and attendant injunctive relief relating to land owned by Roxie Castro (“Respondent”). The area in dispute is a pathway (“the Lane”) approximately 660 feet in length which is located along the southernmost border of Respondent’s property, adjoins the easternmost north-south line of Appellants’ property, and leads to Farm Road 229 in Greene County, Missouri. 1 In its judgment, the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Whittom v. Alexander-Richardson PartnershipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Flowers v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Franck Bros., Inc. v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Humphreys v. WooldridgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Sleepy Hollow Ranch LLC v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Baker v. Walnut Bowls, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Lagermann v. Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance Co. of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- JAMES R. BAKER and LINDA BAKER, and CHARLES E. HIGHTOWER, DIANE HIGHTOWER, MARVIN D. GRIFFITH, MARILYN SUE GRIFFITH, and THE UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS OF JAMES ELLIS THOMPSON, JR v. WALNUT BOWLS, INC., Defendant-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014