In re the Personal Restraint of Reise
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
¶1 Michael John Reise seeks relief from personal restraint to withdraw his straight guilty plea to second degree murder due to newly discovered evidence of a witness. We hold that under the general rule, a defendant pleading guilty (not by a Newton1 plea), renders irrelevant the question of whether the State could have proved guilt — either that the newly discovered evidence would change the result or is not sufficient. Thus, Reise’s guilty plea generally bars a later collateral attack based on newly discovered evidence. And although a superior court must allow a defendant to withdraw a…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Haring v. ProsiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jamison v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- In re the Personal Restraint of CrowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Sebastian Michael GreggCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In Re SpencerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- In re the Personal Restraint of SpencerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.