Legal Opinion
Cepeda v. Coughlin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1992No. 91 Civ. 2469 (RWS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Thomas A. Coughlin, III (“Commissioner Coughlin”), J. O’Gorman (“Officer O’Gorman”), Bobbie Jo LaBoy (“Sergeant LaBoy”) and Lt. McMahon (“Lieutenant McMahon”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff pro se Ramón Cepeda (“Cepeda”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
The Parties
Commissioner Coughlin is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Davidson v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Moscowitz v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Landy v. IrizarryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Thomas v. CaleroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.