Legal Opinion
Melvin Memphry Carter v. Beverly Hills Federal Savings Bank and Southland Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1992No. 91-55029Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
952 F.2d 406
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Melvin Memphry CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BEVERLY HILLS FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK and Southland Company,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-55029.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 1991
Decided Jan. 9, 1992.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Schmidt v. MacCo Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Wood v. HersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.