Legal Opinion

United States v. Trent

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 24, 2008No. Case 3:07cr196PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT (DOC. #22), AS SUPPLEMENTED BY DOC. #31; DIRECTIVE TO GOVERNMENT’S COUNSEL

WALTER HERBERT RICE, District Judge.

Defendant Roger Dale Trent (“Defendant” or “Trent”) is charged in the Indictment (Doc. # 12) with one count of traveling in interstate commerce and knowingly failing to register as a sex offender, as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). In its entirety, the Indictment provides:

Between on or about November 2, 2007 and November 25, 2007, the…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. HallDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
  2. United States v. BaccamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. GagnonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
  4. United States v. HannDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
  5. United States v. HernandezDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API