Legal Opinion
Lauro v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 29, 1948No. Civil Action No. 9741Published
1Opinion of the Court
FAKE, District Judge.
The issues now before the court arise on a motion to strike the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The complaint is founded upon a policy of insurance issued to the plaintiff. It contains the following clause:
“The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in consideration of an additional premium of Sixteen dollars * * * DOTH HEREBY AGREE, that if while the above numbered policy is in full force and effect, and before default in the payment of any premium, the company receives due proof that the Insured, as the result of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mobley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- O'Neill v. Supreme CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Marciano v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1943