Legal Opinion

Ange ex rel. Sledge v. Ange

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1981No. 813SC188PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

Plaintiff first argues that the court erred in refusing to allow an additional thirteen witnesses to testify as to their opinion of plaintiffs mental capacity. It is clear that a trial judge, in his discretion, may limit the number of witnesses that a party may call so as to prevent needless waste of time. See State v. Wright, 274 N.C. 380, 163 S.E. 2d 897 (1968); Board of Transportation v. Rentals, Inc., 28 N.C. App. 114, 220 S.E. 2d 198 (1975); 5 A.L.R. 3d 238. In the case sub judice, plaintiffs counsel inquired of five witnesses as to their opinion of plaintiffs mental capacity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. In Re the Will of KempSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Board of Transportation v. Eastern Developers & Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woody v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API