Ange ex rel. Sledge v. Ange
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
Plaintiff first argues that the court erred in refusing to allow an additional thirteen witnesses to testify as to their opinion of plaintiffs mental capacity. It is clear that a trial judge, in his discretion, may limit the number of witnesses that a party may call so as to prevent needless waste of time. See State v. Wright, 274 N.C. 380, 163 S.E. 2d 897 (1968); Board of Transportation v. Rentals, Inc., 28 N.C. App. 114, 220 S.E. 2d 198 (1975); 5 A.L.R. 3d 238. In the case sub judice, plaintiffs counsel inquired of five witnesses as to their opinion of plaintiffs mental capacity…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- In Re the Will of KempSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Board of Transportation v. Eastern Developers & Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- Woody v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997