Aldrich v. Belmore (In Re Belmore)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
TERRY L. MYERS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Plaintiffs asserted that their claim against the Defendants should be excepted from discharge under § 523(a)(6) 1 as a “willful and malicious injury.” Following trial, Bankruptcy Judge Alfred C. Hagan entered a Memorandum of Decision agreeing that the requirements of § 523(a)(6) had been met. That decision was entered on December 17, 1997. The then-current standard for such matters was Impulsora Del Territorio Sur v. Cecchini (In re Cecchini), 780 F.2d 1440, 1443 (9th Cir.1986). Judge Hagan expressly applied that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Backlund v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Sam Title, AKA Sam Teitelman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Spokane Railway Credit Union v. Endicott (In Re Endicott)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2000