United States v. Márquez-Pérez
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
A fair proceeding before a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process. See In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955). Claiming that judicial misconduct, inadequate preparation time, and attorney ineffectiveness denied him a fair proceeding, René Már-quez-Pérez asks us to vacate his conviction and sentence. We hold that the judge’s conduct of the trial, though in one instance unfortunate, did not prejudice Márquez; and that the judge did not deny him adequate preparation time. We are less sanguine about counsel’s performance; because we…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Starks, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Ortiz-VegaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. MessnerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Larry Rodriguez v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
- United States v. Vazquez-RijosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.