Legal Opinion

De Groot v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 15, 1864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On the Proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Casey, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of tbe Court.

When tbis cause was before us on tbe demurrer, we ruled tbat tbe case, as tben presented in tbe claimant’s petition, could not be sustained as an award, because Secretary Floyd bad transcended bis powers under tbe submission, as limited and defined by tbe joint resolutions of tbe 3d March, 1857, and 15th June, 1860. And Congress having expressly repealed tbe latter resolution, and sent tbe case to tbis court for examination, it was to be beard and tried on its facts and merits, irrespective of tbe award. Tbe claimant, however, believing tbat…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1866
  2. Montgomery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1914
  3. Kraemer Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. KRAEMER MILLS, INCORPORATED v. the UNITED STATESUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API