Legal Opinion

Miranda v. Shell Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 1993No. F013486PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DIBIASO, J.

Plaintiffs ask this court to reverse the entry of a summary judgment in their “toxic-tort” action.

We will reverse the summary judgment. In the published portion, we hold that the cost of future medical monitoring, to detect the onset of disease caused by exposure to pollutants, is a “detriment” under Civil Code section 3333.

Statement of Case and Facts

Defendants manufactured and sold the pesticide 1, 2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP). The plaintiffs named in the third amended complaint numbered well in excess of 100, and were alleged to be students or adults who drank water…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. William Hagerty v. L & L Marine Services, Inc., and Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bower v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hansen v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Skrbina v. Fleming Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. In Re Mattel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API