Miranda v. Shell Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DIBIASO, J.
Plaintiffs ask this court to reverse the entry of a summary judgment in their “toxic-tort” action.
We will reverse the summary judgment. In the published portion, we hold that the cost of future medical monitoring, to detect the onset of disease caused by exposure to pollutants, is a “detriment” under Civil Code section 3333.
Statement of Case and Facts
Defendants manufactured and sold the pesticide 1, 2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP). The plaintiffs named in the third amended complaint numbered well in excess of 100, and were alleged to be students or adults who drank water…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- William Hagerty v. L & L Marine Services, Inc., and Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Bower v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
- Hansen v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Skrbina v. Fleming Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- In Re Mattel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.