Jung v. Southland Corporation
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
EYLER, Judge.
We are called upon to interpret the Workers’ Compensation Act and to decide whether the Workers’ Compensation Commission has the authority to modify an injured employee’s “average weekly wage,” based on an increase in wages subsequent to the accidental injury and subsequent to the initial determination of “average weekly wage.”
For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the decision of the trial court and hold that “average weekly wage” cannot be modified based on an actual increase in wages occurring subsequent to the accidental injury.
Facts
Appellant, Peter Jung, filed a Workers’…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Frank v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Gatewood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- DeBusk v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Lowery v. McCormick Asbestos Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Ranger v. New Hampshire Youth Development CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jung v. Southland Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Ametek, Inc. v. O'CONNORCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Richard Beavers Constr., Inc. v. WagstaffCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Wills v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Miller v. Sealy Furniture CompanyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999