Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Colby

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1878PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. • Trespass for fishing in plaintiff’s lake. Defendant brings error.

1Per curiam

The small lake or pond on which the alleged trespass was committed was almost entirely enclosed within the lines of plaintiff’s farm. Whatever question might arise respecting the right to exclusive fisheries in larger bodies of water, the right of the land-owner to the exclusive control of small bodies thus situated would seem clear.

It has always been customary, however, to permit the public to take fish in all the small lakes and ponds of the State, and in the absence of any notification to the contrary, we think any one may understand that he is licensed to do so. No such notification…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. McKee v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Douglas v. BerglandMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Winans v. WillettsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Johnson v. BurghornMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Gratz v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API