Legal Opinion
Bryan Lustig, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Daniel Markus, Inc. (D/B/A Perfect Pawn), Daniel Risis, Margarita Risis and Oleg Neizvestny
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 20, 2026No. 2:20-cv-00379Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY BRYAN LUSTIG, on behalf of himself and all thers similarly si others similarly situated, No. 20-cv-379 Plaintiff, (Consolidated No, 22-cy-161) DANIEL MARKUS, INC. (D/B/A PERFECT PAWN), DANIEL RISIS, MARGARITA RISIS AND OLEG NEIZVESTNY, OPINION Defendants. WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J: Before the Court are Defendant Daniel M. Risis’s (“Mr. Risis”) “Emergency Notice of Constitutional Obstruction, Due Process Violation, and Motion to Vacate Summary Judgment,” ECF No, 231, Mr. Risis’s “Motion to Vacate Void Judgment,” ECF No, 238…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Enterprise Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litigation v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United States v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- USA ex rel. Donald Palmer v. C&D Technologies IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Samson Energy Resources Co. v. Semcrude, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.