Legal Opinion

Wyatt v. Henderson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1897PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From Linn: George H. Burnett, Judge. Action by E. T. Wyatt against George Henderson and J. W. Stuchell to recover possession of certain oats'. There was a verdict and a judgment for what portion of the property remained on hand, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

This is an action to recover the possession of five thousand bushels of oats, or, if the same cannot be had, the sum of $1,250, as the value thereof. The facta are that on September 11,1894, one J. C. Bohannon, in consideration of $1,300, executed to the plaintiff a bill of sale of a quantity of oats, which recited that one thousand bushels were then stored in the *50defendant’s warehouse, and the remainder, or five thousand bushels, was in sacks on the plaintiff’s farm in Linn County. Bohannon having agreed, as a part of the consideration, to haul the latter…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bros. v. Mobile & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Evarts v. StegerOregon Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Rogers v. . WeirNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Ball v. DoudOregon Supreme Court · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wyoming Sawmills, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Iwanicki v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Cummings v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  4. Ward v. Queen City Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Kiernan v. KratzOregon Supreme Court · 1902

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API