Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shotts v. City of Madison

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided September 2, 2014No. 2013-KM-01108-COAPublished

1DissentJames, J.

¶ 27. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the State failed to meet its burden of proof. Because I find that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction, I respectfully dissent.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 28. I recite the facts consistent with the proceedings below. Shotts began a dating relationship with Amanda Winkler in September 2010. At the time, Shotts was employed at Chateau La Pooch, a dog-grooming and boarding establishment operated by Shotts’s family and located in Madison, Mississippi. On April 7, 2011, Winkler dropped her dog, Chloe, off at Chateau La Pooch…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duncan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
  3. Nix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000
  4. Rembert v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Hill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API