Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2003No. 2002-KM-01650-SCTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice, for the Court.

¶ 1. Kenneth B. Hill appeals his conviction for animal cruelty alleging that Miss. Code Ann. § 97-41-16 (2000), the statute under which he was convicted, is unconstitutionally vague under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Finding the statute constitutional, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. Alfred E. Mills owns and resides on a 202-acre farm near Batesville, Mississippi. Mills purchased the farm in 1995 from Kenneth B. Hill’s father and sister. Hill resided in a mobile home on a three-acre *102plot in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Nicholson on Behalf of Gollott v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. Quitman CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Willie Carl Pickett v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
  2. Shotts v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API