Legal Opinion

John Doe v. Gothriel LaFleur

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1999No. 98-3290PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MCMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

John Doe, a Minnesota prisoner, appeals from a final order entered in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota granting summary judgment in favor of the Minnesota Commissioner of Corrections (Commissioner) and holding that the Minnesota Community Notification Act (MCNA) does not violate the ex post facto clause as applied to him. Doe v. LaFleur, No. CV 97-1936 (D.Minn. Aug. 3, 1998) (adopting magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, id. (July 2, 1998) (hereinafter Report & Recommendation)). For reasons stated below, we dismiss the case.

Jurisd…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Missouri v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reimer v. Champion Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  2. National Right to Life Political Action Committee v. LambDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2002
  3. Dianne L. Shea v. Sidney EsenstenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  4. Frank Lupiani v. Wal-Mart StoresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. Frank Lupiani v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API