Legal Opinion
National Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Lamb
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided April 9, 2002No. 00-04200-CV-C-5PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAUGHREY, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The parties have agreed that there are no factual issues in dispute and the cross motions can be decided as a matter of law. Having reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties, the Court grants the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, as it relates to Count VII of Plaintiffs’ Complaint. Plaintiffs’ remaining claims are dismissed because they are not justiciable.
I. Factual Background
Plaintiff National Right to Life Committee, Inc. (“NRLC”) is a national, not-for-profit…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Iowa Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. SmithsonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010
- National Right to Life Political Action Committee v. ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- National Right To Life Political Action Committee v. Robert F. ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003