Legal Opinion

HIGHLAND PARK CARE CENTER v. CAMPMED CASUALTY & INDEMNITY COMPANY OF MARYLAND

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01673Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HIGHLAND PARK CARE ) ) CENTER, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) 2:18-cv-1673 ) vs. ) ) ) CAMPMED CASUALTY & ) INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ) ) MARYLAND, ) ) Defendant. ) ) OPINION J. Nicholas Ranjan, United States District Judge This lawsuit mainly involves two insurance-coverage issues. One, when does an insurer’s duty to defend end? And, two, can an insurer limit its liability to pay ongoing post-judgment interest on a verdict under a standard-interest clause by tendering that verdict? The material and undisputed factual allegations…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. 401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Benjamin Post v. St Paul Travelers Ins CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  5. Millers Capital Insurance Co. v. Gambone Bros. Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API