Legal Opinion

United States v. Neal

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 18, 2012No. 11-3506PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

While Fred Neal, Jr., was on pretrial release awaiting trial, the government petitioned the district court to have him committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) for an inpatient competency evaluation. In response, Neal’s counsel conceded reasonable cause existed to question her client’s competency, but contended the government had not provided sufficient reasons to justify detaining Neal for an inpatient commitment, and asked the court to order an outpatient evaluation. Without conducting a hearing or making any factual findings, the district court granted the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Heidemann v. RotherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Priscilla J. DetersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Revels v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas ZaveskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Charlie SongCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. MosleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017
  4. United States v. TarnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API