Legal Opinion

Entwistle v. Safety Indemnity Insurance

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 31, 2015No. MICV201302526DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Krupp, Peter B., J.

Plaintiffs Anne Entwistle (“Anne”) and Erik Entwistle (“Erik”) (together, “the Entwistles”) lost personal property in a fire at a family-owned home in Vermont. Because the insurance on that home was insufficient to cover the loss, the Entwistles filed a claim under two other homeowner policies, one with defendant Safety Indemnity Insurance Company (“Safety”), which insured their princi*562pal residence in Cambridge, and the other with defendant York Insurance Company of Maine (“York”), which insured their newly purchased vacation home in New Hampshire. The Entwistles filed this…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API