Legal Opinion
United Student Aid Funds, Incorporated v. Duncan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 5, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-1137PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge
On July 10, 2015, the United States Department of Education issued a “Dear Col league Letter” addressing when a “guaranty agency” may assess “collection costs” to a defaulting borrower. Guaranty agencies are private entities that purchase defaulted student loans from primary lenders and then attempt to bring the borrowers back into compliance, an industry practice known as loan rehabilitation. Collection costs, as the term implies, are costs incurred by the guaranty agency in attempting to collect on a defaulted student…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Student Aid Funds, Incorporated v. DuncanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Am. Bar Ass'n v. U.S. Dep't of Educ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019