Legal Opinion
Grier v. Cornelius
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 11, 1966No. 18504PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Moss, Chief Justice.
Willie James Grier, the appellant herein, instituted this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of the negligence of Cherosse Cornelius and Jack Cornelius, Jr., the respondents herein.
The appellant alleged in his complaint that on November 17, 1961, while he was riding as a passenger in a 1952 Chrysler automobile owned by Cherosse Cornelius, which was her family car, and driven by Jack Cornelius, Jr., her son, and her agent and servant, the said automobile left the road and collided with a tree near the intersection of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Seay v. Southern Ry. &8212 Carolina DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- Smith v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Jennings v. McCowanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- Pike v. . SeymourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Green v. SparksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Vereen v. Liberty Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
- Cantrell v. CarruthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
- Reid Ex Rel. Estate of Reid v. SwindlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
- Carter v. JORDAN OIL CO., INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.