State v. Farber
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUCKER, Judge.
Appellee-Defendant Timothy R. Farber filed a motion to suppress the evidence which the trial court granted. In this interlocutory appeal the State challenges the trial court’s ruling. We address the following issues: 1) does the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine require the exclusion of evidence derived from conversations protected by the statutory spousal privilege; 2) was Farber’s confession given knowingly and voluntarily; and 3) did the trial court err in suppressing evidence recovered from the home of Far- ber’s acquaintance. We affirm in part and reverse in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. FriedelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. EstepIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Callahan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. GlassIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.