Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Wallace & Gale Co. (In re Wallace & Gale Co.)

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 18, 2002No. Bankruptcy No. 85-A-0092; Civ. No. PJM 94-2327Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MESSITTE, District Judge.

I

The Court considers the claim of the Intervenors that, between 1962 and 1965, Travelers Casualty Insurance Company issued certain comprehensive general liability (CGL) policies to Wallace & Gale, Inc.,1 *561the insulation contractor in bankruptcy whose insurance status is the subject of these proceedings.

In a previous Opinion, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Intervenors, establishing the existence and the terms and conditions of the policies in question. The Court concluded, that “(t)he evidence that CGL policies covering bodily injury claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Emons Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. Barranco v. KostensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Warfield-Dorsey Co. v. THE TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY CO.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Wallace & Gale Co. (In Re Wallace & Gale Co.)District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  5. Krouse v. KrouseCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API