Krouse v. Krouse
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ALPERT, Judge.
Allen J. Krouse, III, appellee, successfully challenged testator’s purported Last Will and Testament as having been procured by fraud and/or undue influence. John M. Krouse, appellant, a primary beneficiary under the purported will, subsequently appealed to this court and correspondingly asks us to address the following five questions:
I. Did the trial court err when it refused to give an instruction that clear and convincing proof was necessary to establish the fraud alleged?
II. Did the trial court err when it failed to direct judgment for the defendant/caveatee John at the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Robeson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Bachrach v. Washington United Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Griffith v. DiffenderfferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- American Laundry MacHinery Industries v. HoranCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coleman v. Anne Arundel County Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- McGraw v. Loyola Ford, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Meyers v. Montgomery County Police DepartmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Upman v. ClarkeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Wallace & Gale Co. (In re Wallace & Gale Co.)District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.