Legal Opinion
Proulx v. Citibank, N.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 11, 1988No. 84 Civ. 8156, 85 Civ. 4348 (MBM)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
On October 26, 1982, Michael Proulx, an employee of Citibank, N.A., filed a complaint with the New York State Division of Human Rights (“DHR”) charging Citibank, through the acts of Proulx’s supervisor, Robert Ganey, with sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. After that agency failed to sustain his claim and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission adopted that conclusion as its own, he sued in this Court. Notwithstanding an assumption arguendo that his DHR complaint was not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Grant v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cox v. Onondaga County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Luciano v. Olsten Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Maturo v. National Graphics, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- McIntosh v. Irving Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Sudul v. Computer Outsourcing Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.