Legal Opinion
Grant v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 22, 1980No. 845, Docket 79-7842PublishedCited by 229 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:
The Union and three of its officers appeal from a judgment of the Southern District of New York, Whitman Knapp, Judge, finding that they discriminated against the appellees, three black ironworkers employed by Bethlehem Steel Corporation in the structural steel industry, in retaliation for their prosecution of charges against Bethle*45hem and the Union before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and in a Title VII class action. Judge Knapp also awarded back pay. We affirm.
The three appellees filed EEOC charges against Bethlehem and their Union, Local 40 of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dr. Joy HOCHSTADT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORCESTER FOUNDATION FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Rios v. Enterprise Ass'n Steamfitters, Local No. 638Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- 13 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1436, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,206 Manuel Aguirre v. Chula Vista Sanitary Service and Sani-Tainer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by229 opinions
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Henry Dicarlo v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Clement SUMNER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Espinal v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Summa v. Hofstra UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.