Legal Opinion

Deltec, Inc. v. Floyd H. Laster, Floyd J. Moltchan and Webster B. Harpman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 20, 1964No. 15168_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from an order of the District Court granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

The complaint charged the defendants with a conspiracy to violate the anti-trust and patent laws. 15 U.S.C. § 15 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338. It alleged six acts of defendants in support thereof, namely: (1) the filing in the Patent Office by Floyd Laster of a spurious patent application covering design features of the plaintiff’s products; (2) the dissemination to plaintiff’s dealers, distributors, suppliers, business…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kobe, Inc. v. Dempsey Pump Co. Dempsey Pump Co. v. Kobe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. International Visible Systems Corp. v. Remington-Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  3. Morny v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Riegel Textile Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Rolls-Royce Motors Ltd. v. a & a FIBERGLASS, INC.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1977
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
  4. Miller v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Brunswick Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Riegel Textile Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API