Legal Opinion
Dorsey v. American Express Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 29, 2010No. Civil Action 07-0885 (PLF)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM. OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Michael B. Dorsey, proceeding pro se, alleges that defendant Citibank, N.A., (“Citibank”) breached a fiduciary obligation to him by failing to process timely an online payment to his American Express account. This matter currently is before the Court on Citibank’s motion for summary judgment. Upon careful consideration of the motion, the opposition, the entire record in this case, and the relevant case law, the Court will grant Citibank’s motion. 1
I. BACKGROUND
Michael Dorsey was the holder of an American Express credit card…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Air Transport Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Export-Import BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hedgeye Risk Management, LLC v. HeldmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. CafesjianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Essroc Cement Corp. v. CTI/D.C., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Alemayehu v. AbereCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.