Legal Opinion
Takashi Kataoka v. May Department Stores Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1940No. 9479PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Takashi Kataoka (an infant suing by his guardian ad litem) 1 ***and 'Tsutomu Kataoka, brought this action against appellees, The May Department Stores Company (hereafter called May Company) and Jerry Goddord, in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California. Appellees answered, the case came on for trial, a jury was empaneled, appellants presented their evidence and, at the conclusion thereof, appellees moved the court to dismiss the action on the ground that, upon the facts and the law, appellants had shown no right to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Dollar S. S. Lines, Inc. v. MerzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Gavica v. DonaughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
3Cited by32 opinions
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Safeco Insurance Co. Of America v. William GuytonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Karen Jean Hymer v. Benjamin K. Chal and Victoria Leilani ChaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Keene Lumber Co. v. LeventhalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Anne Arnold and Edward E. Arnold v. Tex Troccoli, Also Known as "Tex Barton,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.