Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1923No. 17979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered September 1, 1922, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to set aside a conveyance as in fraud of creditors, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— This action was instituted by respondent, as receiver, to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance and subject certain property to tbe claims of creditors. From a judgment granting the relief sought, appellants, who were defendants below, have appealed'.

A number of judgments were recovered against the community composed of the appellants Gr. J. Anderson and wife, and thereafter supplemental proceedings were begun upon one of the judgments in accordance with Rem. Comp. Stat., §613 et seq. [P. C. §7927]. In the course of these proceedings, under the direct authority of §640, Rem. Comp.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. WeedWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herr v. SchwagerWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Sato v. First National Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. F. S. Harmon & Co. v. Olympic Furniture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Ganoung v. Chinto Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Sage v. Intergraphics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API