Smith v. Weed
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered June 21, 1912, appointing a receiver in proceedings supplementary to execution, after a hearing before the court, in consolidated actions for damages from fire.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
Two actions were brought, one by the Electric Logging Company, another by Michael J. Smith and wife, and Christian Schultz and wife, against James Weed and Susan Weed, to recover damages for the burning of property of the respective plaintiffs by fires, set out by James Weed on land of which he was in control, and negligently allowed to spread. The two actions, being based on the same facts, were consolidated. Each of the two sets of plaintiffs recovered judgment satisfiable out of the separate property of James Weed and the property of the marital community consisting of James Weed and Susan…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewis v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- McDowell v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- First National Bank of Laramie v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
- Field v. GreinerWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Spaulding v. Coeur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Seventh Elect Church in Israel v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Crandall v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Pappas v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Erfurth v. ErfurthWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- In Re the Estate of BarbeeWashington Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.