Legal Opinion
Sikorsky Financial Credit Union, Inc. v. Butts
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 6, 2013No. AC 34669PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
Pursuant to the terms of a retail instalment contract for the purchase of an automobile, the defendant agreed that, in the event of his default, he would be hable for postmaturity interest on the deficiency balance. The issue in this case is whether this provision determined the rate of interest for postjudgment interest. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court concluding that postjudgment interest was governed by General Statutes § 37-Sa1 rather than *757by the contract. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In a complaint filed on July 12, 2011, the plaintiff,…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Opoku v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Little v. United National Investors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Ballou v. LAW OFFICES HOWARD LEE SCHIFFSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Cadle Co. v. D'ADDARIOConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Salce v. WolczekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Sikorsky Financial Credit Union, Inc. v. ButtsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015