Legal Opinion

Saechao v. Matsakoun

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 1, 1986No. A8406-03428; CA A34147Published

1Opinion of the Court

717 P.2d 165 (1986)

78 Or.App. 341

Yoon Fou SAECHAO, Guardian Ad Litem for Kae Fou Saechao, Sou Fou Saechao, and Farm Fou Saechao, Appellant,

v.

Khamchana MATSAKOUN and Thon Boupha, Respondents.

A8406-03428; CA A34147.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.[*]

Argued and Submitted June 3, 1985.

Resubmitted February 5, 1986.

Decided April 9, 1986.

Reconsideration Denied June 6, 1986.

Review Allowed July 1, 1986.

Stephen C. Hendricks, Portland, argued the cause and filed brief for appellant.

Robert E. Barton, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on brief was Cosgrave, Kester, Crowe, Gidley &…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bovsun v. SanperiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API