Legal Opinion

Pontiff v. Alexander

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 3, 1946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

In this action of tort for property damage the judge found for the plaintiff and declined to make certain rulings requested by the defendant which raised the issue whether the disposition of an action for personal injuries between the parties, which arose out of the same accident, barred as res judicata the present action. This is the only question for decision; From an order of the Appellate Division dismissing the report from the District Court the defendant appealed.

The judge made findings of fact; those material to this appeal may be summarized as follows: An automobile owned and operated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dearden v. HeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Lawrence v. O'NeillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Alpert v. Mercury Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Biggio v. MageeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Farnum v. BradyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kilroy v. BarronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Hacker v. BeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Fitzgerald v. GranvilleMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Kirby v. DawsonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API