Legal Opinion
Farnum v. Brady
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 8, 1929PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The plaintiff by writs, each of which is dated April 10, 1922, brought two actions of contract against the defendant in the Superior Court for the county of Worcester. The writs were duly entered and a declaration and answer in each case were filed. On October 6, 1924, under Common Law Rule 63 of the Superior Court (1915), afterwards Common Law Rule 62 of the Superior Court (1923), the actions were dismissed for lack of prosecution. On May 4, 1925, the plaintiff brought these actions in the Superior Court to recover for the same causes of *54action as were originally set forth. The defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Foster v. Richard BusteedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Karrick v. WetmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Hutchins v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mulligan v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Gallo v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Abbott v. BeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Nelson v. Town of BelmontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Biggio v. MageeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.