Legal Opinion

Richards v. Midkiff

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1964No. 4298Published

1Opinion of the Court

396 P.2d 49 (1964)

Atherton RICHARDS, Trustee under the Will and of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Deceased,

v.

Frank E. MIDKIFF, Edwin P. Murray and Richard Lyman, Jr., Trustees under the Will and of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Deceased, Hualalai Development Corporation, a Hawaiian Corporation, and Shiro Kashiwa, Attorney General of the State of Hawaii.

No. 4298.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

September 4, 1964.

Masaji Marumoto, Honolulu, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Garner Anthony, Honolulu (Robertson, Castle & Anthony and Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades, Honolulu, on the brief), for Trustees…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Smith v. SwormstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Midkiff v. Castle & Cooke, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Richards v. MidkiffHawaii Supreme Court · 1964

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API