Legal Opinion

Wazenski v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover for personal injuries which the plaintiff received while in the defendant's employ by falling from a coal trestle. On the trial the plaintiff was nonsuited, and hence upon this review he is entitled to the most favorable view of the evidence that the case will warrant. All disputed questions of fact and all reasonable inferences to be deduced from the testimony must be resolved in his favor.

The plaintiff was a laborer unloading coal upon the trestle. The trestle extended east and west and was two hundred and forty feet long, twenty-five feet high, twenty-six feet…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scharff v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Dixon v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Ford v. McAdooNew York Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API