Legal Opinion

Ford v. McAdoo

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1919Published

Motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Kellogg (A. L.), J.

This is a motion for a new trial, resultant from the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $12,500.

The action was brought by the plaintiff, Margaret H. Ford, as administratrix of the estate of her husband, Truman C. Ford, against the defendant Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Bailroad Company to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the widow and next-of-kin by reason of his death, on or about the 29th day of April, 1918, while he was in defendant’s employ as head brakeman on its railroad. Before the trial of the action William Gr. McAdoo,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Delk v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Johnson v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API